"Good fame is like fire; when you have kindled you may easily preserve it; but if you extinguish it, you will not easily kindle it again."
Obviously the good people at Amazon.com follow the golden rule of drug dealing, "don't sample the product", otherwise someone might have come across Bacon's word of wisdom and so would have avoided the Great Kindle Debacle. For those of you who have no idea what I am talking about (believe me, I don't blame you) Amazon recently decided that it would retroactively reverse purchase decisions concerning the electronic version of George Orwell's 1984 on its Kindle e-book reader.
On finding out that the version they were selling was in fact not licensed for the North American market they decided to wipe it off everyone's Kindle (which connects to the internet via Wi- Fi) without actually asking permission. So people who had bought the book through Amazon woke up to find that there edition had suddenly vanished (click here for more details from New York Times).
Although I do not own a Kindle (Call me dumb but shelling out 300 dollars to read a book seems a mite stoopid) the story caught my attention as it does concern the idea of copyright and DRM (digital rights management). The first point that struck me was why is a book written over 50 years ago is still covered by copyright, you'd have thought that half a century was more than enough time to make your money on any piece of writing.
Second and perhaps more importantly the whole Kindle furor has raised issues about who gets to decide what you see, read and listen to. Apparently, people can wipe stuff off your hardware without your permission and it is all perfectly legal. At least that is Amazon's argument according to company spokesman, Drew Herdener,
"When we were notified of this by the rights holder, we removed the illegal copies from our systems and from customers' devices, and refunded customers,"
Yes, but without asking them first, Drew. So what's next? Spyware from itunes to check you have only legitimate downloads on your ipod? Or perhaps a DVD that silently contacts the authorities should you try to feed it an illegally obtained copy of Desperate Housewives? Why stop there? Perhaps we should allow the police to get serious about such copyright abuses and since 95% of all music downloads are illegal they shouldn't need to bother with such nit-picking details as a warrant since it is obvious, virtually everyone is guilty.
Actually, the whole Kindle story smacks of the kind of stupidity that comes from studying too much for that law degree/MBA instead of getting an education. You can be sure that whoever made this call spent four years demanding that the campus library stay open 24/7 and that Saturdays should be considered a normal working day for staff. How else can you explain a decision that has cost millions in bad publicity and made a laughing stock of the product Amazon is trying so hard to launch. This is stupid gone to college, dumb with a degree, morons with MBAs.
Once again I struggle to understand why somebody would buy a Kindle when there are a plethora of cheap laptops for the same price and less which can be used to download any number of books free of charge from the internet. What's more they even have a colour screen!!!!! How very 1984.
